RMD vs TRU: Correlation
ResMed (RMD) and TransUnion (TRU) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.43.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are RMD and TRU?
Over the past 3 years, RMD and TRU moved with a correlation of 0.43, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.29) than the 3-year average (0.43). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.43, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 561.2 %².
Within RMD's tracked universe of 29 assets, TRU comes in at #15 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives TRU the advantage: -15.5% versus -4.3%, a 11.2-point spread.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
RMD vs TRU: side by side
| RMD (ResMed) | TRU (TransUnion) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -15.5% | -4.3% |
| 5-year return | -14.6% | -27.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 31.2% | 41.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.79 | 1.71 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -37.3% | -47.3% |
| Market cap | $34.0B | $16.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | 22.6 | 22.3 |
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | 0.28% |
| Sector / category | Health Care | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | RMD | TRU |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -19.5% | -51.9% |
| 2023 | -16.5% | +21.8% |
| 2024 | +34.2% | +35.6% |
| 2025 | +6.3% | -7.0% |
| 2026 | -1.3% | -0.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are RMD and TRU good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.43 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between RMD and TRU?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.43 over 3 years, with 0.29 over the last year and 0.43 over 5 years.
Is TRU a good diversifier for RMD?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.43 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.43 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.43 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rmd-vs-tru.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rmd-vs-tru/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: RMD correlations · TRU correlations
