PairBook
HomeRMCO › RMCO vs SSM

RMCO vs SSM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Royalty Management Holding Corporation (RMCO) and Sono Group N.V. (SSM) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.08
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.21
long-run
Ann. covariance
-21908.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RMCO and SSM?

Over the past 3 years, RMCO and SSM moved with a correlation of -0.21, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.08) than the 3-year average (-0.21). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.21, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -21908.0 %².

SSM is close to the least connected end of RMCO's tracked universe, ranking #10 of 10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with RMCO ahead by 97.1 points (+46.6% versus -50.5%). One caveat on sizing: SSM is 13.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RMCO vs SSM: side by side

RMCO (Royalty Management Holding Corporation)SSM (Sono Group N.V.)
1-year return+46.6%-50.5%
5-year return-70.7%-99.9%
Volatility (ann.)87.1%1204.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.250.56
Max drawdown (3Y)-93.2%-99.4%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.33%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: RMCO 0.33% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RMCO -93.2% vs -99.4%Higher 5y return: RMCO -70.7% vs -99.9%
-82%0%+119%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. RMCO · SSM

Year-by-year returns

YearRMCOSSM
2022-0.4%-89.8%
2023-83.0%-93.9%
2024-41.3%-16.7%
2025+211.1%+86.7%
2026-6.3%-61.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are RMCO and SSM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, RMCO and SSM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RMCO and SSM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with -0.08 over the last year and -0.21 over 5 years.

Is SSM a good diversifier for RMCO?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, RMCO and SSM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rmco-vs-ssm.json

RMCO vs SSM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21RMCO vs SSM-0.21

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![RMCO vs SSM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rmco-vs-ssm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rmco-vs-ssm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RMCO correlations · SSM correlations