PairBook
HomeRH › RH vs VXZ

RH vs VXZ: Correlation

RH (RH) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.48.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.48
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.50
long-run
Ann. covariance
-831.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RH and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of RH and VXZ correlate at -0.48, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.32) than the 3-year average (-0.48). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.50, with an annualized covariance of -831.5 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of RH's tracked universe, ranking #16 of 16. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VXZ ahead by 20.4 points (-36.5% versus -16.1%). Note the risk asymmetry: RH runs 2.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RH vs VXZ: side by side

RH (RH)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-36.5%-16.1%
5-year return-79.8%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)67.4%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5002.60-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-75.2%-36.4%
Market cap$2.7B
P/E (trailing)28.7
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -75.2%Higher 5y return: VXZ -53.1% vs -79.8%
-55%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. RH · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearRHVXZ
2022-50.1%+0.5%
2023+9.1%-44.0%
2024+35.0%-12.7%
2025-54.5%+5.7%
2026-19.2%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are RH and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.48 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RH and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between RH and VXZ is -0.48 over 3 years, -0.32 over 1 year and -0.50 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for RH?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.48 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.48 mean?

A reading of -0.48 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rh-vs-vxz.json

RH vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.48RH vs VXZ-0.48

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![RH vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rh-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rh-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RH correlations · VXZ correlations