RGS vs TULP: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Regis Corporation (RGS) and Bloomia Holdings, Inc. (TULP) carry a correlation of 0.26, a weak link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are RGS and TULP?
On 3 years of weekly data the RGS/TULP correlation comes out at 0.26, weak. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.26) than the 3-year average (0.26). The 5-year figure is 0.07, and annualized covariance runs at 3092.4 %².
Among the 14 assets we track against RGS, TULP ranks #8 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RGS outperformed by 60.1 percentage points (+19.7% for RGS against -40.4% for TULP). Note the risk asymmetry: RGS runs 4.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
RGS vs TULP: side by side
| RGS (Regis Corporation) | TULP (Bloomia Holdings, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +19.7% | -40.4% |
| 5-year return | -75.3% | -59.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 226.7% | 52.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.65 | 0.08 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -81.1% | -53.2% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 0.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | RGS | TULP |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -29.9% | -66.2% |
| 2023 | -61.3% | -41.0% |
| 2024 | +151.0% | +5.2% |
| 2025 | +17.0% | -28.9% |
| 2026 | -2.7% | -1.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are RGS and TULP good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.26, RGS and TULP keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between RGS and TULP?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between RGS and TULP is 0.26 over 3 years, -0.26 over 1 year and 0.07 over 5 years.
Is TULP a good diversifier for RGS?
Reasonably. At 0.26, RGS and TULP keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.26 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.26 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rgs-vs-tulp.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rgs-vs-tulp/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: RGS correlations · TULP correlations
