PairBook
HomeRCL › RCL vs XLF

RCL vs XLF: Correlation

Royal Caribbean Group (RCL) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.59.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.59
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.58
long-run
Ann. covariance
395.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RCL and XLF?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of RCL and XLF correlate at 0.59, moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.33 versus 0.59 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.58, with an annualized covariance of 395.9 %².

Within RCL's tracked universe of 37 assets, XLF comes in at #13 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: XLF led by 28.6 percentage points, -19.3% for RCL against +9.3% for XLF. Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.36 to 0.79. One caveat on sizing: RCL is 2.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RCL vs XLF: side by side

RCL (Royal Caribbean Group)XLF (Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return-19.3%+9.3%
5-year return+257.6%+64.2%
Volatility (ann.)41.3%16.2%
Beta vs S&P 5001.460.84
Max drawdown (3Y)-35.0%-15.5%
Market cap$76.2B
P/E (trailing)17.9
Dividend yield1.72%1.42%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$57.9B
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionarySector ETF
Higher yield: RCL 1.72% vs 1.42%Smaller drawdown: XLF -15.5% vs -35.0%Higher 5y return: RCL +257.6% vs +64.2%

XLF is a Financial fund from State Street Investment Management: $57.9B under management, 77 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 1.42% trailing dividend yield.

-28%0%+11%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). RCL · XLF

Year-by-year returns

YearRCLXLF
2022-35.7%-10.6%
2023+162.0%+12.0%
2024+79.0%+30.6%
2025+22.5%+14.9%
2026+3.2%+6.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are RCL and XLF good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.59 means RCL and XLF share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RCL and XLF?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.59 over 3 years, with 0.33 over the last year and 0.58 over 5 years.

Is XLF a good diversifier for RCL?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.59 means RCL and XLF share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.59 mean?

A reading of 0.59 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rcl-vs-xlf.json

RCL vs XLF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.59RCL vs XLF0.59

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![RCL vs XLF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rcl-vs-xlf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rcl-vs-xlf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RCL correlations · XLF correlations