PairBook
HomeQTI › QTI vs VOR

QTI vs VOR: Correlation

QT Imaging Holdings, Inc. (QTI) and Vor Biopharma Inc. (VOR) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.30.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.30
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.29
long-run
Ann. covariance
7527.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are QTI and VOR?

Over the past 3 years, QTI and VOR moved with a correlation of 0.30, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.18) than the 3-year average (0.30). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.29, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 7527.9 %².

Among the 24 assets we track against QTI, VOR ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VOR outperformed by 50.4 percentage points (-91.6% for QTI against -41.2% for VOR). Note the risk asymmetry: VOR runs 2.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

QTI vs VOR: side by side

QTI (QT Imaging Holdings, Inc.)VOR (Vor Biopharma Inc.)
1-year return-91.6%-41.2%
5-year return-97.9%-92.3%
Volatility (ann.)108.2%230.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.123.86
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.6%-94.7%
Market cap$1.4B
P/E (trailing)0.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VOR -94.7% vs -98.6%Higher 5y return: VOR -92.3% vs -97.9%
-93%0%+4%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. QTI · VOR

Year-by-year returns

YearQTIVOR
2022+3.1%-42.8%
2023+7.7%-66.2%
2024-95.6%-50.7%
2025-16.7%-41.1%
2026-48.9%+79.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are QTI and VOR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.30 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between QTI and VOR?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.30 over 3 years, with 0.18 over the last year and 0.29 over 5 years.

Is VOR a good diversifier for QTI?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.30 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.30 mean?

A reading of 0.30 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/qti-vs-vor.json

QTI vs VOR: 3-year weekly correlation 0.30QTI vs VOR0.30

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![QTI vs VOR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/qti-vs-vor.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/qti-vs-vor/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: QTI correlations · VOR correlations