PairBook
HomeQNME › QNME vs SCI

QNME vs SCI: Correlation

How closely do Quanome Technologies, Inc. (QNME) and Service Corporation International (SCI) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.32, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.32
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-894.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are QNME and SCI?

On 3 years of weekly data the QNME/SCI correlation comes out at -0.32, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.33 over 1 year against -0.32 over 3. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -894.1 %².

SCI is close to the least connected end of QNME's tracked universe, ranking #9 of 10. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SCI outperformed by 71.0 percentage points (-64.5% for QNME against +6.5% for SCI). Note the risk asymmetry: QNME runs 5.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

QNME vs SCI: side by side

QNME (Quanome Technologies, Inc.)SCI (Service Corporation International)
1-year return-64.5%+6.5%
5-year returnn/a+44.7%
Volatility (ann.)118.3%23.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.910.47
Max drawdown (3Y)-93.7%-21.6%
Market cap$11.4B
P/E (trailing)21.8
Dividend yield0.00%1.59%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: SCI 1.59% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SCI -21.6% vs -93.7%
-76%0%+21%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. QNME · SCI

Year-by-year returns

YearQNMESCI
2022-1.0%
2023+0.7%
2024+18.4%
2025-64.4%-0.7%
2026-65.7%+8.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are QNME and SCI good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between QNME and SCI?

The QNME/SCI correlation stands at -0.32 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.33, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SCI a good diversifier for QNME?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?

A reading of -0.32 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/qnme-vs-sci.json

QNME vs SCI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.32QNME vs SCI-0.32

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![QNME vs SCI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/qnme-vs-sci.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/qnme-vs-sci/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: QNME correlations · SCI correlations