PairBook
HomePWP › PWP vs VXZ

PWP vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.53, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.53
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.40
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.47
long-run
Ann. covariance
-544.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PWP and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, PWP and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.53, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.40) than the 3-year average (-0.53). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.47, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -544.1 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against PWP, VXZ lands near the bottom at #10. Over the last 12 months VXZ came out ahead by 7.2 percentage points (-23.3% against -16.1%). Risk is not evenly split, since PWP carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PWP vs VXZ: side by side

PWP (Perella Weinberg Partners)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-23.3%-16.1%
5-year return+35.6%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)40.0%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.36-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-43.1%-36.4%
Market cap$1.7B
P/E (trailing)62.8
Dividend yield1.70%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -43.1%Higher 5y return: PWP +35.6% vs -53.1%
-31%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. PWP · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearPWPVXZ
2022-21.2%+0.5%
2023+28.4%-44.0%
2024+98.2%-12.7%
2025-26.5%+5.7%
2026-1.3%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PWP and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.53 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PWP and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.53 over 3 years, with -0.40 over the last year and -0.47 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for PWP?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.53 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.53 mean?

A reading of -0.53 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pwp-vs-vxz.json

PWP vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.53PWP vs VXZ-0.53

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![PWP vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pwp-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pwp-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PWP correlations · VXZ correlations