PairBook
HomePPC › PPC vs SMH

PPC vs SMH: Correlation

How closely do Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.02
long-run
Ann. covariance
-199.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PPC and SMH?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of PPC and SMH correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.35) than the 3-year average (-0.20). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.02, with an annualized covariance of -199.7 %².

Within PPC's tracked universe of 23 assets, SMH comes in at #11 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: SMH led by 123.9 percentage points, -30.8% for PPC against +93.1% for SMH.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PPC vs SMH: side by side

PPC (Pilgrim's Pride Corporation)SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF)
1-year return-30.8%+93.1%
5-year return+32.4%+332.8%
Volatility (ann.)30.3%33.7%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.171.91
Max drawdown (3Y)-49.2%-35.7%
Market cap$7.4B
P/E (trailing)13.6
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · Thematic
Smaller drawdown: SMH -35.7% vs -49.2%Higher 5y return: SMH +332.8% vs +32.4%
-38%0%+126%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. PPC · SMH

Year-by-year returns

YearPPCSMH
2022-15.9%-33.5%
2023+16.6%+73.4%
2024+64.1%+39.1%
2025+1.4%+49.2%
2026-20.2%+59.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PPC and SMH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PPC and SMH?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between PPC and SMH is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.35 over 1 year and -0.02 over 5 years.

Is SMH a good diversifier for PPC?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ppc-vs-smh.json

PPC vs SMH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20PPC vs SMH-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![PPC vs SMH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ppc-vs-smh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ppc-vs-smh/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PPC correlations · SMH correlations