PairBook
HomePOST › POST vs QCOM

POST vs QCOM: Correlation

Post Holdings, Inc. (POST) and Qualcomm (QCOM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.25.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-242.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are POST and QCOM?

Over the past 3 years, POST and QCOM moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.35 over 1 year against -0.25 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.10, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -242.0 %².

QCOM is close to the least connected end of POST's tracked universe, ranking #15 of 19. The last year tells two different stories: QCOM led by 33.4 percentage points, -28.1% for POST against +5.3% for QCOM. One caveat on sizing: QCOM is 1.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

POST vs QCOM: side by side

POST (Post Holdings, Inc.)QCOM (Qualcomm)
1-year return-28.1%+5.3%
5-year return+11.2%+25.8%
Volatility (ann.)23.0%42.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.111.77
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.9%-44.2%
Market cap$3.7B$176.0B
P/E (trailing)14.918.9
Dividend yield0.00%2.19%
Sector / categoryUS ListedInformation Technology
Lower P/E: POST 14.9 vs 18.9Higher yield: QCOM 2.19% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: POST -36.9% vs -44.2%Higher 5y return: QCOM +25.8% vs +11.2%
-27%0%+59%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. POST · QCOM

Year-by-year returns

YearPOSTQCOM
2022+22.3%-38.6%
2023-2.4%+35.1%
2024+30.0%+8.3%
2025-13.5%+13.8%
2026-17.7%-2.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are POST and QCOM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, POST and QCOM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between POST and QCOM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.25 over 3 years, with -0.35 over the last year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is QCOM a good diversifier for POST?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, POST and QCOM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/post-vs-qcom.json

POST vs QCOM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25POST vs QCOM-0.25

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![POST vs QCOM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/post-vs-qcom.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/post-vs-qcom/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: POST correlations · QCOM correlations