PairBook
HomePLNT › PLNT vs RLYB

PLNT vs RLYB: Correlation

How closely do Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) and Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.26, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.52
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.11
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1013.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PLNT and RLYB?

On 3 years of weekly data the PLNT/RLYB correlation comes out at -0.26, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.52) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.26). The 5-year figure is -0.11, and annualized covariance runs at -1013.1 %².

Within PLNT's tracked universe of 24 assets, RLYB comes in at #17 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RLYB outperformed by 306.2 percentage points (-51.1% for PLNT against +255.1% for RLYB). Risk is not evenly split, since RLYB carries 2.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PLNT vs RLYB: side by side

PLNT (Planet Fitness, Inc.)RLYB (Rallybio Corporation)
1-year return-51.1%+255.1%
5-year return-36.6%-83.7%
Volatility (ann.)39.0%99.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.420.78
Max drawdown (3Y)-61.2%-95.5%
Market cap$3.9B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)17.62.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: RLYB 2.1 vs 17.6Smaller drawdown: PLNT -61.2% vs -95.5%Higher 5y return: PLNT -36.6% vs -83.7%
-56%0%+249%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PLNT · RLYB

Year-by-year returns

YearPLNTRLYB
2022-13.0%-31.1%
2023-7.4%-63.6%
2024+35.4%-59.8%
2025+9.7%-28.5%
2026-52.3%+205.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PLNT and RLYB good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, PLNT and RLYB have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PLNT and RLYB?

The PLNT/RLYB correlation stands at -0.26 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.52, 5 years: -0.11), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RLYB a good diversifier for PLNT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, PLNT and RLYB have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/plnt-vs-rlyb.json

PLNT vs RLYB: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26PLNT vs RLYB-0.26

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![PLNT vs RLYB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/plnt-vs-rlyb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/plnt-vs-rlyb/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PLNT correlations · RLYB correlations