PairBook
HomePLAG › PLAG vs ZETA

PLAG vs ZETA: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) carry a correlation of -0.27, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.09
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3125.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PLAG and ZETA?

Over the past 3 years, PLAG and ZETA moved with a correlation of -0.27, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.09) than the 3-year average (-0.27). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.14, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -3125.8 %².

ZETA is close to the least connected end of PLAG's tracked universe, ranking #20 of 20. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ZETA ahead by 110.8 points (-59.1% versus +51.7%). Note the risk asymmetry: PLAG runs 2.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PLAG vs ZETA: side by side

PLAG (Planet Green Holdings Corp.)ZETA (Zeta Global Holdings Corp.)
1-year return-59.1%+51.7%
5-year return-94.2%+373.7%
Volatility (ann.)160.4%71.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.672.30
Max drawdown (3Y)-93.8%-70.0%
Market cap$7.5B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ZETA -70.0% vs -93.8%Higher 5y return: ZETA +373.7% vs -94.2%
-67%0%+136%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PLAG · ZETA

Year-by-year returns

YearPLAGZETA
2022-39.2%-3.0%
2023-21.0%+8.0%
2024-46.9%+104.0%
2025-15.8%+13.1%
2026-67.0%+48.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PLAG and ZETA good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PLAG and ZETA?

The PLAG/ZETA correlation stands at -0.27 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.09, 5 years: -0.14), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ZETA a good diversifier for PLAG?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

A reading of -0.27 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/plag-vs-zeta.json

PLAG vs ZETA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27PLAG vs ZETA-0.27

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![PLAG vs ZETA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/plag-vs-zeta.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/plag-vs-zeta/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PLAG correlations · ZETA correlations