PairBook
HomePINS › PINS vs TRI

PINS vs TRI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) carry a correlation of 0.50, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.50
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.61
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.46
long-run
Ann. covariance
776.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PINS and TRI?

Over the past 3 years, PINS and TRI moved with a correlation of 0.50, which is moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.61) runs above the 3-year figure (0.50). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.46, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 776.7 %².

By 3-year correlation, TRI places #4 of the 16 assets tracked against PINS. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at -36.7% for PINS and -37.6% for TRI. One caveat on sizing: PINS is 1.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PINS vs TRI: side by side

PINS (Pinterest, Inc.)TRI (Thomson Reuters Corp)
1-year return-36.7%-37.6%
5-year return-59.5%-0.4%
Volatility (ann.)48.1%32.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.480.53
Max drawdown (3Y)-65.7%-62.9%
Market cap$13.0B$45.4B
P/E (trailing)69.327.6
Dividend yield0.00%2.48%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: TRI 27.6 vs 69.3Higher yield: TRI 2.48% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TRI -62.9% vs -65.7%Higher 5y return: TRI -0.4% vs -59.5%
-59%0%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PINS · TRI

Year-by-year returns

YearPINSTRI
2022-33.2%-3.0%
2023+52.6%+30.0%
2024-21.7%+11.1%
2025-10.7%-16.6%
2026-11.6%-17.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PINS and TRI good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.50 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PINS and TRI?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.50 over 3 years, with 0.61 over the last year and 0.46 over 5 years.

Is TRI a good diversifier for PINS?

To a limited degree. At 0.50 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.50 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.50 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pins-vs-tri.json

PINS vs TRI: 3-year weekly correlation 0.50PINS vs TRI0.50

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![PINS vs TRI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pins-vs-tri.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pins-vs-tri/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PINS correlations · TRI correlations