PairBook
HomePH › PH vs XLF

PH vs XLF: Correlation

How closely do Parker Hannifin (PH) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.67, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.67
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.70
long-run
Ann. covariance
287.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PH and XLF?

Over the past 3 years, PH and XLF moved with a correlation of 0.67, which is strong. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.37) runs below the 3-year figure (0.67). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.70, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 287.8 %².

Among the 57 assets we track against PH, XLF ranks #15 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with PH ahead by 23.5 points (+32.8% versus +9.3%). Do not treat this figure as fixed: across three years the rolling one-year correlation ranged all the way from 0.37 to 0.88. Risk is not evenly split, since PH carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PH vs XLF: side by side

PH (Parker Hannifin)XLF (Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+32.8%+9.3%
5-year return+256.4%+64.2%
Volatility (ann.)26.6%16.2%
Beta vs S&P 5001.160.84
Max drawdown (3Y)-26.8%-15.5%
Market cap$127.5B
P/E (trailing)36.5
Dividend yield0.71%1.42%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$57.9B
Sector / categoryIndustrialsSector ETF
Higher yield: XLF 1.42% vs 0.71%Smaller drawdown: XLF -15.5% vs -26.8%Higher 5y return: PH +256.4% vs +64.2%

XLF is a Financial fund from State Street Investment Management: $57.9B under management, 77 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 1.42% trailing dividend yield.

-9%0%+42%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). PH · XLF

Year-by-year returns

YearPHXLF
2022-6.9%-10.6%
2023+60.8%+12.0%
2024+39.6%+30.6%
2025+39.5%+14.9%
2026+15.5%+6.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PH and XLF good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.67 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PH and XLF?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.67 over 3 years, with 0.37 over the last year and 0.70 over 5 years.

Is XLF a good diversifier for PH?

To a limited degree. At 0.67 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.67 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.67 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ph-vs-xlf.json

PH vs XLF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.67PH vs XLF0.67

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![PH vs XLF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ph-vs-xlf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ph-vs-xlf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PH correlations · XLF correlations