PairBook
HomePH › PH vs SNA

PH vs SNA: Correlation

How closely do Parker Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.52, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.52
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.49
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.62
long-run
Ann. covariance
291.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PH and SNA?

On 3 years of weekly data the PH/SNA correlation comes out at 0.52, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.49 over 1 year against 0.52 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.62, and annualized covariance runs at 291.8 %².

Among the 57 assets we track against PH, SNA ranks #36 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives PH the advantage: +32.8% versus +23.1%, a 9.7-point spread. Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.32 to 0.72.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PH vs SNA: side by side

PH (Parker Hannifin)SNA (Snap-on)
1-year return+32.8%+23.1%
5-year return+256.4%+99.6%
Volatility (ann.)26.6%21.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.160.70
Max drawdown (3Y)-26.8%-20.8%
Market cap$127.5B$20.5B
P/E (trailing)36.520.2
Dividend yield0.71%2.38%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsIndustrials
Lower P/E: SNA 20.2 vs 36.5Higher yield: SNA 2.38% vs 0.71%Smaller drawdown: SNA -20.8% vs -26.8%Higher 5y return: PH +256.4% vs +99.6%
-6%0%+42%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PH · SNA

Year-by-year returns

YearPHSNA
2022-6.9%+8.9%
2023+60.8%+29.7%
2024+39.6%+20.7%
2025+39.5%+4.3%
2026+15.5%+17.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PH and SNA good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.52 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PH and SNA?

The PH/SNA correlation stands at 0.52 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.49, 5 years: 0.62), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SNA a good diversifier for PH?

To a limited degree. At 0.52 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.52 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.52 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ph-vs-sna.json

PH vs SNA: 3-year weekly correlation 0.52PH vs SNA0.52

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![PH vs SNA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ph-vs-sna.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ph-vs-sna/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PH correlations · SNA correlations