PairBook
HomePD › PD vs SMX

PD vs SMX: Correlation

How closely do PagerDuty, Inc. (PD) and SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company (SMX) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.21, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.16
long-run
Ann. covariance
-9623.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PD and SMX?

Over the past 3 years, PD and SMX moved with a correlation of -0.21, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.28 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.16, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -9623.4 %².

SMX is close to the least connected end of PD's tracked universe, ranking #14 of 17. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months PD outperformed by 70.7 percentage points (-25.5% for PD against -96.2% for SMX). Risk is not evenly split, since SMX carries 16.4 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PD vs SMX: side by side

PD (PagerDuty, Inc.)SMX (SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company)
1-year return-25.5%-96.2%
5-year return-70.4%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)52.9%869.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.446.86
Max drawdown (3Y)-78.4%-100.0%
Market cap$1.0B
P/E (trailing)5.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: PD -78.4% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: PD -70.4% vs -100.0%
-98%0%+2043%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PD · SMX

Year-by-year returns

YearPDSMX
2022-23.6%+3.5%
2023-12.8%-99.7%
2024-21.1%-98.9%
2025-28.2%-99.7%
2026-3.7%-90.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PD and SMX good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PD and SMX?

The PD/SMX correlation stands at -0.21 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.28, 5 years: -0.16), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SMX a good diversifier for PD?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pd-vs-smx.json

PD vs SMX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21PD vs SMX-0.21

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![PD vs SMX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pd-vs-smx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pd-vs-smx/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PD correlations · SMX correlations