PairBook
HomePAVS › PAVS vs PFG

PAVS vs PFG: Correlation

Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. - Class A (PAVS) and Principal Financial Group (PFG) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.15.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.15
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-472.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PAVS and PFG?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of PAVS and PFG correlate at -0.15, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.22 over 1 year against -0.15 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.10, with an annualized covariance of -472.3 %².

Within PAVS's tracked universe of 13 assets, PFG comes in at #8 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with PFG ahead by 143.9 points (-100.0% versus +43.9%). Risk is not evenly split, since PAVS carries 5.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PAVS vs PFG: side by side

PAVS (Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. - Class A)PFG (Principal Financial Group)
1-year return-100.0%+43.9%
5-year return-100.0%+99.7%
Volatility (ann.)133.6%22.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.060.88
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-22.4%
Market cap$24.0B
P/E (trailing)16.0
Dividend yield0.00%2.84%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: PFG 2.84% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PFG -22.4% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: PFG +99.7% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+46%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PAVS · PFG

Year-by-year returns

YearPAVSPFG
2022-61.1%+20.1%
2023-44.6%-2.8%
2024-44.4%+1.9%
2025-98.7%+18.4%
2026-99.7%+29.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PAVS and PFG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.15, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PAVS and PFG?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between PAVS and PFG is -0.15 over 3 years, -0.22 over 1 year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is PFG a good diversifier for PAVS?

Yes: at -0.15, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.15 mean?

A reading of -0.15 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pavs-vs-pfg.json

PAVS vs PFG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.15PAVS vs PFG-0.15

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![PAVS vs PFG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pavs-vs-pfg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pavs-vs-pfg/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PAVS correlations · PFG correlations