PairBook
HomePAPL › PAPL vs VCV

PAPL vs VCV: Correlation

Pineapple Financial Inc. (PAPL) and Invesco California Value Municipal Income Trust (VCV) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.31.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.31
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.17
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-699.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PAPL and VCV?

Over the past 3 years, PAPL and VCV moved with a correlation of -0.31, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.17 versus -0.31 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -699.0 %².

Out of 51 assets tracked against PAPL, VCV lands near the bottom at #51. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VCV ahead by 81.2 points (-70.7% versus +10.5%). Risk is not evenly split, since PAPL carries 13.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PAPL vs VCV: side by side

PAPL (Pineapple Financial Inc.)VCV (Invesco California Value Municipal Income Trust)
1-year return-70.7%+10.5%
5-year returnn/a-0.3%
Volatility (ann.)181.2%13.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.730.24
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.4%-13.3%
Market cap$0.5B
P/E (trailing)40.4
Dividend yield0.00%7.38%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: VCV 7.38% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: VCV -13.3% vs -99.4%
-91%0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. PAPL · VCV

Year-by-year returns

YearPAPLVCV
2022-28.4%
2023+7.9%
2024-74.7%+18.7%
2025-84.4%+9.5%
2026-25.5%-0.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PAPL and VCV good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.31, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PAPL and VCV?

The PAPL/VCV correlation stands at -0.31 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.17, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VCV a good diversifier for PAPL?

Yes: at -0.31, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.31 mean?

A reading of -0.31 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/papl-vs-vcv.json

PAPL vs VCV: 3-year weekly correlation -0.31PAPL vs VCV-0.31

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![PAPL vs VCV correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/papl-vs-vcv.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/papl-vs-vcv/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PAPL correlations · VCV correlations