PairBook
HomePAGP › PAGP vs PBK

PAGP vs PBK: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. - Class A Shares representing (PAGP) and PowerBank Corporation (PBK) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.50
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-507.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PAGP and PBK?

On 3 years of weekly data the PAGP/PBK correlation comes out at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.50) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.23). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -507.8 %².

Out of 14 assets tracked against PAGP, PBK lands near the bottom at #12. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months PAGP outperformed by 137.6 percentage points (+58.9% for PAGP against -78.7% for PBK). Risk is not evenly split, since PBK carries 4.1 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PAGP vs PBK: side by side

PAGP (Plains GP Holdings, L.P. - Class A Shares representing)PBK (PowerBank Corporation)
1-year return+58.9%-78.7%
5-year return+318.4%n/a
Volatility (ann.)23.3%96.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.250.19
Max drawdown (3Y)-21.0%-93.7%
Market cap$6.5B
P/E (trailing)80.1
Dividend yield5.81%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: PAGP 5.81% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PAGP -21.0% vs -93.7%
-78%0%+64%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PAGP · PBK

Year-by-year returns

YearPAGPPBK
2022+31.8%
2023+38.1%
2024+23.7%
2025+12.7%-11.7%
2026+54.5%-75.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PAGP and PBK good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PAGP and PBK?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between PAGP and PBK is -0.23 over 3 years, -0.50 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is PBK a good diversifier for PAGP?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pagp-vs-pbk.json

PAGP vs PBK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23PAGP vs PBK-0.23

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![PAGP vs PBK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pagp-vs-pbk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pagp-vs-pbk/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PAGP correlations · PBK correlations