PairBook
HomePACK › PACK vs WSM

PACK vs WSM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Ranpak Holdings Corp (PACK) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) carry a correlation of 0.48, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.48
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.40
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.45
long-run
Ann. covariance
1562.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PACK and WSM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of PACK and WSM correlate at 0.48, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.40) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.45, with an annualized covariance of 1562.0 %².

Among the 14 assets we track against PACK, WSM ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with WSM ahead by 32.7 points (-6.9% versus +25.8%). Note the risk asymmetry: PACK runs 1.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PACK vs WSM: side by side

PACK (Ranpak Holdings Corp)WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.)
1-year return-6.9%+25.8%
5-year return-83.7%+182.0%
Volatility (ann.)75.3%43.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.811.33
Max drawdown (3Y)-64.5%-36.8%
Market cap$0.4B$28.1B
P/E (trailing)24.4
Dividend yield0.00%0.56%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Discretionary
Higher yield: WSM 0.56% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WSM -36.8% vs -64.5%Higher 5y return: WSM +182.0% vs -83.7%
-37%0%+42%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. PACK · WSM

Year-by-year returns

YearPACKWSM
2022-84.6%-30.5%
2023+0.9%+80.2%
2024+18.2%+86.6%
2025-21.4%-2.1%
2026-7.2%+34.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PACK and WSM good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.48, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PACK and WSM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between PACK and WSM is 0.48 over 3 years, 0.40 over 1 year and 0.45 over 5 years.

Is WSM a good diversifier for PACK?

A fair diversifier. At 0.48, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pack-vs-wsm.json

PACK vs WSM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.48PACK vs WSM0.48

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![PACK vs WSM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pack-vs-wsm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pack-vs-wsm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PACK correlations · WSM correlations