PairBook
HomePAAS › PAAS vs SCZM

PAAS vs SCZM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) and Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (SCZM) carry a correlation of 0.73, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.73
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.80
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.64
long-run
Ann. covariance
3809.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PAAS and SCZM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of PAAS and SCZM correlate at 0.73, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.80) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.64, with an annualized covariance of 3809.9 %².

Within PAAS's tracked universe of 42 assets, SCZM comes in at #19 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SCZM outperformed by 40.9 percentage points (+67.9% for PAAS against +108.8% for SCZM). Risk is not evenly split, since SCZM carries 1.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PAAS vs SCZM: side by side

PAAS (Pan American Silver Corp.)SCZM (Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.)
1-year return+67.9%+108.8%
5-year return+135.6%+818.6%
Volatility (ann.)54.5%96.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.111.72
Max drawdown (3Y)-38.8%-63.2%
Market cap$22.8B$0.9B
P/E (trailing)16.221.3
Dividend yield1.18%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: PAAS 16.2 vs 21.3Higher yield: PAAS 1.18% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PAAS -38.8% vs -63.2%Higher 5y return: SCZM +818.6% vs +135.6%
-7%0%+180%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). PAAS · SCZM

Year-by-year returns

YearPAASSCZM
2022-33.0%+25.0%
2023+2.5%-38.3%
2024+26.6%+5.5%
2025+158.4%+1137.2%
2026+6.9%+3.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PAAS and SCZM good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.73 means PAAS and SCZM share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PAAS and SCZM?

The PAAS/SCZM correlation stands at 0.73 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.80, 5 years: 0.64), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SCZM a good diversifier for PAAS?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.73 means PAAS and SCZM share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.73 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.73 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/paas-vs-sczm.json

PAAS vs SCZM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.73PAAS vs SCZM0.73

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![PAAS vs SCZM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/paas-vs-sczm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/paas-vs-sczm/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PAAS correlations · SCZM correlations