PairBook
HomeOSS › OSS vs ZTS

OSS vs ZTS: Correlation

One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS) and Zoetis (ZTS) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.40
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-584.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are OSS and ZTS?

Over the past 3 years, OSS and ZTS moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.40) than the 3-year average (-0.24). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.12, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -584.5 %².

ZTS is close to the least connected end of OSS's tracked universe, ranking #14 of 16. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with OSS ahead by 131.3 points (+80.5% versus -50.8%). Note the risk asymmetry: OSS runs 2.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

OSS vs ZTS: side by side

OSS (One Stop Systems, Inc.)ZTS (Zoetis)
1-year return+80.5%-50.8%
5-year return+103.2%-61.5%
Volatility (ann.)82.4%30.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.820.51
Max drawdown (3Y)-56.0%-63.0%
Market cap$0.3B$31.0B
P/E (trailing)12.7
Dividend yield0.00%2.66%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Higher yield: ZTS 2.66% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: OSS -56.0% vs -63.0%Higher 5y return: OSS +103.2% vs -61.5%
-52%0%+222%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). OSS · ZTS

Year-by-year returns

YearOSSZTS
2022-39.2%-39.5%
2023-30.2%+35.9%
2024+59.5%-16.6%
2025+114.3%-21.8%
2026+57.7%-39.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are OSS and ZTS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between OSS and ZTS?

The OSS/ZTS correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.40, 5 years: -0.12), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ZTS a good diversifier for OSS?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/oss-vs-zts.json

OSS vs ZTS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24OSS vs ZTS-0.24

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![OSS vs ZTS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/oss-vs-zts.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/oss-vs-zts/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: OSS correlations · ZTS correlations