PairBook
HomeON › ON vs SMH

ON vs SMH: Correlation

How closely do ON Semiconductor (ON) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.59, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.59
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.63
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.67
long-run
Ann. covariance
984.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ON and SMH?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ON and SMH correlate at 0.59, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.63 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.67, with an annualized covariance of 984.1 %².

Within ON's tracked universe of 29 assets, SMH comes in at #10 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SMH ahead by 47.1 points (+46.0% versus +93.1%). The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.37 and 0.79 over the past three years, a moderate range.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ON vs SMH: side by side

ON (ON Semiconductor)SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF)
1-year return+46.0%+93.1%
5-year return+65.2%+332.8%
Volatility (ann.)49.2%33.7%
Beta vs S&P 5001.611.91
Max drawdown (3Y)-67.9%-35.7%
Market cap$29.1B
P/E (trailing)47.9
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyETF · Thematic
Smaller drawdown: SMH -35.7% vs -67.9%Higher 5y return: SMH +332.8% vs +65.2%
-7%0%+148%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ON · SMH

Year-by-year returns

YearONSMH
2022-8.2%-33.5%
2023+33.9%+73.4%
2024-24.5%+39.1%
2025-14.1%+49.2%
2026+38.1%+59.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ON and SMH good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.59 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ON and SMH?

The ON/SMH correlation stands at 0.59 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.63, 5 years: 0.67), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SMH a good diversifier for ON?

To a limited degree. At 0.59 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.59 mean?

A reading of 0.59 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/on-vs-smh.json

ON vs SMH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.59ON vs SMH0.59

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ON vs SMH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/on-vs-smh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/on-vs-smh/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ON correlations · SMH correlations