PairBook
HomeOMH › OMH vs XPOF

OMH vs XPOF: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Ohmyhome Limited - Class A (OMH) and Xponential Fitness, Inc. (XPOF) carry a correlation of -0.26, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-10189.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are OMH and XPOF?

Over the past 3 years, OMH and XPOF moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.04) than the 3-year average (-0.26). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -10189.9 %².

Within OMH's tracked universe of 72 assets, XPOF comes in at #59 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months XPOF outperformed by 56.7 percentage points (-93.6% for OMH against -36.9% for XPOF). One caveat on sizing: OMH is 5.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

OMH vs XPOF: side by side

OMH (Ohmyhome Limited - Class A)XPOF (Xponential Fitness, Inc.)
1-year return-93.6%-36.9%
5-year returnn/a-52.9%
Volatility (ann.)448.2%88.8%
Beta vs S&P 500-3.851.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.9%-81.1%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: XPOF -81.1% vs -97.9%
-93%0%+65%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. OMH · XPOF

Year-by-year returns

YearOMHXPOF
2022+12.2%
2023-43.8%
2024-73.9%+4.3%
2025+102.0%-38.8%
2026-90.6%-34.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are OMH and XPOF good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between OMH and XPOF?

The OMH/XPOF correlation stands at -0.26 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.04, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is XPOF a good diversifier for OMH?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.26 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/omh-vs-xpof.json

OMH vs XPOF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26OMH vs XPOF-0.26

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![OMH vs XPOF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/omh-vs-xpof.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/omh-vs-xpof/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: OMH correlations · XPOF correlations