PairBook
HomeOMH › OMH vs ROST

OMH vs ROST: Correlation

How closely do Ohmyhome Limited - Class A (OMH) and Ross Stores (ROST) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.29, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.29
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3109.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are OMH and ROST?

Over the past 3 years, OMH and ROST moved with a correlation of -0.29, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.12) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.29). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -3109.9 %².

Among the 72 assets we track against OMH, ROST ranks #66 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ROST outperformed by 147.9 percentage points (-93.6% for OMH against +54.3% for ROST). One caveat on sizing: OMH is 18.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

OMH vs ROST: side by side

OMH (Ohmyhome Limited - Class A)ROST (Ross Stores)
1-year return-93.6%+54.3%
5-year returnn/a+105.0%
Volatility (ann.)448.2%24.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-3.850.66
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.9%-21.1%
Market cap$73.7B
P/E (trailing)27.8
Dividend yield0.00%0.72%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Discretionary
Higher yield: ROST 0.72% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: ROST -21.1% vs -97.9%
-93%0%+71%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). OMH · ROST

Year-by-year returns

YearOMHROST
2022+2.9%
2023+20.6%
2024-73.9%+10.4%
2025+102.0%+20.4%
2026-90.6%+28.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are OMH and ROST good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.29 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between OMH and ROST?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between OMH and ROST is -0.29 over 3 years, -0.12 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is ROST a good diversifier for OMH?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.29 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.29 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/omh-vs-rost.json

OMH vs ROST: 3-year weekly correlation -0.29OMH vs ROST-0.29

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![OMH vs ROST correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/omh-vs-rost.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/omh-vs-rost/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: OMH correlations · ROST correlations