PairBook
HomeOMC › OMC vs VXZ

OMC vs VXZ: Correlation

Omnicom Group (OMC) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.35.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.35
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.16
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.38
long-run
Ann. covariance
-251.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are OMC and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of OMC and VXZ correlate at -0.35, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.16) than the 3-year average (-0.35). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.38, with an annualized covariance of -251.8 %².

Among the 36 assets we track against OMC, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #36. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months OMC outperformed by 32.6 percentage points (+16.5% for OMC against -16.1% for VXZ).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

OMC vs VXZ: side by side

OMC (Omnicom Group)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+16.5%-16.1%
5-year return+45.6%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)28.0%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.76-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-33.3%-36.4%
Market cap$24.1B
P/E (trailing)237.5
Dividend yield3.53%
Sector / categoryCommunication ServicesUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: OMC -33.3% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: OMC +45.6% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. OMC · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearOMCVXZ
2022+15.7%+0.5%
2023+9.6%-44.0%
2024+2.5%-12.7%
2025-2.6%+5.7%
2026+11.1%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are OMC and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.35, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between OMC and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.35 over 3 years, with -0.16 over the last year and -0.38 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for OMC?

Yes: at -0.35, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.35 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/omc-vs-vxz.json

OMC vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.35OMC vs VXZ-0.35

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![OMC vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/omc-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/omc-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: OMC correlations · VXZ correlations