PairBook
HomeNMRK › NMRK vs TREE

NMRK vs TREE: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) and LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) carry a correlation of 0.62, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.62
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.55
long-run
Ann. covariance
2062.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are NMRK and TREE?

On 3 years of weekly data the NMRK/TREE correlation comes out at 0.62, strong. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.46) than the 3-year average (0.62). The 5-year figure is 0.55, and annualized covariance runs at 2062.8 %².

Within NMRK's tracked universe of 19 assets, TREE comes in at #7 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months NMRK outperformed by 44.4 percentage points (-13.8% for NMRK against -58.2% for TREE). Note the risk asymmetry: TREE runs 1.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

NMRK vs TREE: side by side

NMRK (Newmark Group, Inc.)TREE (LendingTree, Inc.)
1-year return-13.8%-58.2%
5-year return+23.3%-83.0%
Volatility (ann.)43.4%76.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.491.99
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.6%-63.0%
Market cap$3.8B$0.4B
P/E (trailing)19.72.3
Dividend yield0.95%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: TREE 2.3 vs 19.7Higher yield: NMRK 0.95% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: NMRK -36.6% vs -63.0%Higher 5y return: NMRK +23.3% vs -83.0%
-61%0%+5%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. NMRK · TREE

Year-by-year returns

YearNMRKTREE
2022-57.0%-82.6%
2023+39.9%+42.1%
2024+18.1%+27.8%
2025+36.5%+37.0%
2026-9.5%-46.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are NMRK and TREE good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.62 means NMRK and TREE share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between NMRK and TREE?

The NMRK/TREE correlation stands at 0.62 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.46, 5 years: 0.55), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TREE a good diversifier for NMRK?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.62 means NMRK and TREE share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.62 mean?

A reading of 0.62 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/nmrk-vs-tree.json

NMRK vs TREE: 3-year weekly correlation 0.62NMRK vs TREE0.62

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![NMRK vs TREE correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/nmrk-vs-tree.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/nmrk-vs-tree/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: NMRK correlations · TREE correlations