PairBook
HomeNIVF › NIVF vs WTM

NIVF vs WTM: Correlation

NewGenIvf Group Limited - Class A (NIVF) and White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (WTM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.21.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.06
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.16
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3491.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are NIVF and WTM?

On 3 years of weekly data the NIVF/WTM correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.06) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.21). The 5-year figure is -0.16, and annualized covariance runs at -3491.3 %².

Among the 37 assets we track against NIVF, WTM ranks #22 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with WTM ahead by 115.2 points (-99.9% versus +15.3%). One caveat on sizing: NIVF is 38.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

NIVF vs WTM: side by side

NIVF (NewGenIvf Group Limited - Class A)WTM (White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.)
1-year return-99.9%+15.3%
5-year return-100.0%+90.5%
Volatility (ann.)800.3%20.6%
Beta vs S&P 5005.340.23
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-18.0%
Market cap$5.1B
P/E (trailing)0.04.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.05%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: NIVF 0.0 vs 4.9Higher yield: WTM 0.05% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WTM -18.0% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: WTM +90.5% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+29%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. NIVF · WTM

Year-by-year returns

YearNIVFWTM
2022+39.6%
2023+6.9%+6.5%
2024-96.3%+29.3%
2025-99.3%+6.9%
2026-98.1%+2.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are NIVF and WTM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between NIVF and WTM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with 0.06 over the last year and -0.16 over 5 years.

Is WTM a good diversifier for NIVF?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/nivf-vs-wtm.json

NIVF vs WTM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21NIVF vs WTM-0.21

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![NIVF vs WTM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/nivf-vs-wtm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/nivf-vs-wtm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: NIVF correlations · WTM correlations