PairBook
HomeNIVF › NIVF vs STAA

NIVF vs STAA: Correlation

How closely do NewGenIvf Group Limited - Class A (NIVF) and STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.29, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.29
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.23
long-run
Ann. covariance
-14190.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are NIVF and STAA?

On 3 years of weekly data the NIVF/STAA correlation comes out at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.18) than the 3-year average (-0.29). The 5-year figure is -0.23, and annualized covariance runs at -14190.1 %².

Within NIVF's tracked universe of 37 assets, STAA comes in at #30 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: STAA led by 81.3 percentage points, -99.9% for NIVF against -18.6% for STAA. Risk is not evenly split, since NIVF carries 12.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

NIVF vs STAA: side by side

NIVF (NewGenIvf Group Limited - Class A)STAA (STAAR Surgical Company)
1-year return-99.9%-18.6%
5-year return-100.0%-85.0%
Volatility (ann.)800.3%61.9%
Beta vs S&P 5005.340.90
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-71.1%
Market cap$1.1B
P/E (trailing)0.0279.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: NIVF 0.0 vs 279.9Smaller drawdown: STAA -71.1% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: STAA -85.0% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+16%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. NIVF · STAA

Year-by-year returns

YearNIVFSTAA
2022-46.8%
2023+6.9%-35.7%
2024-96.3%-22.2%
2025-99.3%-4.9%
2026-98.1%-3.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are NIVF and STAA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between NIVF and STAA?

The NIVF/STAA correlation stands at -0.29 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.18, 5 years: -0.23), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is STAA a good diversifier for NIVF?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?

A reading of -0.29 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/nivf-vs-staa.json

NIVF vs STAA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.29NIVF vs STAA-0.29

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![NIVF vs STAA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/nivf-vs-staa.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/nivf-vs-staa/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: NIVF correlations · STAA correlations