NCV vs VXZ: Correlation
Virtus Convertible & Income Fund (NCV) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.55.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are NCV and VXZ?
Over the past 3 years, NCV and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.55, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.51 over 1 year against -0.55 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.57, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -260.1 %².
Out of 16 assets tracked against NCV, VXZ lands near the bottom at #15. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with NCV ahead by 42.1 points (+26.0% versus -16.1%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
NCV vs VXZ: side by side
| NCV (Virtus Convertible & Income Fund) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +26.0% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | +22.6% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 18.3% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.88 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -17.8% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 4.5 | – |
| Dividend yield | 9.84% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | NCV | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -33.9% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | +12.7% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | +16.2% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | +22.6% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | +18.2% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are NCV and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.55, NCV and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between NCV and VXZ?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.55 over 3 years, with -0.51 over the last year and -0.57 over 5 years.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for NCV?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.55, NCV and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.55 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ncv-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ncv-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: NCV correlations · VXZ correlations
