PairBook
HomeNCPL › NCPL vs PHI

NCPL vs PHI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Netcapital Inc. (NCPL) and PLDT Inc. Sponsored ADR (PHI) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.11
long-run
Ann. covariance
-833.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are NCPL and PHI?

Over the past 3 years, NCPL and PHI moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.37) than the 3-year average (-0.23). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.11, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -833.0 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against NCPL, PHI sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #9. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with PHI ahead by 66.2 points (-74.4% versus -8.2%). Risk is not evenly split, since NCPL carries 6.4 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

NCPL vs PHI: side by side

NCPL (Netcapital Inc.)PHI (PLDT Inc. Sponsored ADR)
1-year return-74.4%-8.2%
5-year return-99.9%-17.6%
Volatility (ann.)152.6%24.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.810.22
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.4%-33.7%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)9.4
Dividend yield0.00%494.13%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: PHI 494.13% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PHI -33.7% vs -99.4%Higher 5y return: PHI -17.6% vs -99.9%
-87%0%+37%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. NCPL · PHI

Year-by-year returns

YearNCPLPHI
2022-90.0%-31.7%
2023-85.9%+11.9%
2024-86.0%+0.8%
2025-68.3%+1.5%
2026-18.4%-14.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are NCPL and PHI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between NCPL and PHI?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.23 over 3 years, with -0.37 over the last year and -0.11 over 5 years.

Is PHI a good diversifier for NCPL?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ncpl-vs-phi.json

NCPL vs PHI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23NCPL vs PHI-0.23

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![NCPL vs PHI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ncpl-vs-phi.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ncpl-vs-phi/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: NCPL correlations · PHI correlations