PairBook
HomeMXL › MXL vs RTX

MXL vs RTX: Correlation

MaxLinear, Inc (MXL) and RTX Corporation (RTX) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-535.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MXL and RTX?

On 3 years of weekly data the MXL/RTX correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.36) than the 3-year average (-0.20). The 5-year figure is -0.08, and annualized covariance runs at -535.1 %².

By 3-year correlation, RTX places #17 of the 24 assets tracked against MXL. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MXL outperformed by 244.2 percentage points (+278.9% for MXL against +34.7% for RTX). Risk is not evenly split, since MXL carries 4.2 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MXL vs RTX: side by side

MXL (MaxLinear, Inc)RTX (RTX Corporation)
1-year return+278.9%+34.7%
5-year return+19.8%+178.4%
Volatility (ann.)105.2%25.1%
Beta vs S&P 5002.500.57
Max drawdown (3Y)-63.9%-19.7%
Market cap$5.8B$285.8B
P/E (trailing)37.3
Dividend yield0.00%1.31%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: RTX 1.31% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RTX -19.7% vs -63.9%Higher 5y return: RTX +178.4% vs +19.8%
-13%0%+539%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MXL · RTX

Year-by-year returns

YearMXLRTX
2022-55.0%+20.0%
2023-30.0%-14.4%
2024-16.8%+40.8%
2025-11.9%+61.4%
2026+263.9%+16.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MXL and RTX good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, MXL and RTX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MXL and RTX?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MXL and RTX is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.36 over 1 year and -0.08 over 5 years.

Is RTX a good diversifier for MXL?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, MXL and RTX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mxl-vs-rtx.json

MXL vs RTX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20MXL vs RTX-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MXL vs RTX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mxl-vs-rtx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mxl-vs-rtx/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MXL correlations · RTX correlations