PairBook
HomeMXL › MXL vs NOC

MXL vs NOC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MaxLinear, Inc (MXL) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) carry a correlation of -0.28, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.22
long-run
Ann. covariance
-779.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MXL and NOC?

Over the past 3 years, MXL and NOC moved with a correlation of -0.28, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.47) than the 3-year average (-0.28). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.22, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -779.5 %².

Among the 24 assets we track against MXL, NOC sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #21. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MXL outperformed by 284.5 percentage points (+278.9% for MXL against -5.6% for NOC). Note the risk asymmetry: MXL runs 3.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MXL vs NOC: side by side

MXL (MaxLinear, Inc)NOC (Northrop Grumman)
1-year return+278.9%-5.6%
5-year return+19.8%+60.1%
Volatility (ann.)105.2%26.7%
Beta vs S&P 5002.500.24
Max drawdown (3Y)-63.9%-35.1%
Market cap$5.8B$77.4B
P/E (trailing)17.5
Dividend yield0.00%1.71%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: NOC 1.71% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: NOC -35.1% vs -63.9%Higher 5y return: NOC +60.1% vs +19.8%
-13%0%+539%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MXL · NOC

Year-by-year returns

YearMXLNOC
2022-55.0%+43.0%
2023-30.0%-12.8%
2024-16.8%+1.9%
2025-11.9%+23.6%
2026+263.9%-3.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MXL and NOC good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MXL and NOC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MXL and NOC is -0.28 over 3 years, -0.47 over 1 year and -0.22 over 5 years.

Is NOC a good diversifier for MXL?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.28 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mxl-vs-noc.json

MXL vs NOC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28MXL vs NOC-0.28

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MXL vs NOC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mxl-vs-noc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mxl-vs-noc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MXL correlations · NOC correlations