PairBook
HomeMX › MX vs VRRM

MX vs VRRM: Correlation

Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation (MX) and Verra Mobility Corporation (VRRM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.33.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.33
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.23
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1311.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MX and VRRM?

Over the past 3 years, MX and VRRM moved with a correlation of -0.33, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.46) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.33). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.23, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1311.2 %².

Among the 16 assets we track against MX, VRRM sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #15. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MX ahead by 84.8 points (+2.2% versus -82.6%). Risk is not evenly split, since MX carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MX vs VRRM: side by side

MX (Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation)VRRM (Verra Mobility Corporation)
1-year return+2.2%-82.6%
5-year return-81.9%-71.6%
Volatility (ann.)79.4%50.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.880.33
Max drawdown (3Y)-73.5%-87.5%
Market cap$0.1B$0.7B
P/E (trailing)16.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MX -73.5% vs -87.5%Higher 5y return: VRRM -71.6% vs -81.9%
-84%0%+196%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MX · VRRM

Year-by-year returns

YearMXVRRM
2022-55.2%-10.4%
2023-20.1%+66.5%
2024-46.4%+5.0%
2025-36.6%-7.3%
2026+27.1%-80.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MX and VRRM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, MX and VRRM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MX and VRRM?

The MX/VRRM correlation stands at -0.33 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.46, 5 years: -0.23), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VRRM a good diversifier for MX?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, MX and VRRM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?

A reading of -0.33 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mx-vs-vrrm.json

MX vs VRRM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.33MX vs VRRM-0.33

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MX vs VRRM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mx-vs-vrrm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mx-vs-vrrm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MX correlations · VRRM correlations