MU vs VRRM: Correlation
Micron Technology (MU) and Verra Mobility Corporation (VRRM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MU and VRRM?
Over the past 3 years, MU and VRRM moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.30 versus -0.19 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.11, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -614.3 %².
By 3-year correlation, VRRM places #26 of the 32 assets tracked against MU. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MU ahead by 778.3 points (+695.7% versus -82.6%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MU vs VRRM: side by side
| MU (Micron Technology) | VRRM (Verra Mobility Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +695.7% | -82.6% |
| 5-year return | +1211.2% | -71.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 63.3% | 50.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 2.47 | 0.33 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -57.6% | -87.5% |
| Market cap | – | $0.7B |
| P/E (trailing) | 21.2 | 16.3 |
| Dividend yield | 0.06% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Information Technology | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MU | VRRM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -45.9% | -10.4% |
| 2023 | +71.9% | +66.5% |
| 2024 | -1.0% | +5.0% |
| 2025 | +240.2% | -7.3% |
| 2026 | +227.9% | -80.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MU and VRRM good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MU and VRRM?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MU and VRRM is -0.19 over 3 years, -0.30 over 1 year and -0.11 over 5 years.
Is VRRM a good diversifier for MU?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mu-vs-vrrm.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mu-vs-vrrm/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MU correlations · VRRM correlations
