PairBook
HomeMTX › MTX vs NC

MTX vs NC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Minerals Technologies Inc. (MTX) and NACCO Industries, Inc. (NC) carry a correlation of 0.40, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.40
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.43
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.28
long-run
Ann. covariance
439.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MTX and NC?

Over the past 3 years, MTX and NC moved with a correlation of 0.40, which is moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.43 over 1 year against 0.40 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.28, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 439.1 %².

Among the 17 assets we track against MTX, NC ranks #12 by 3-year correlation. Their 12-month results are close: +12.0% for MTX against +12.2% for NC.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MTX vs NC: side by side

MTX (Minerals Technologies Inc.)NC (NACCO Industries, Inc.)
1-year return+12.0%+12.2%
5-year return-6.2%+96.1%
Volatility (ann.)30.4%36.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.900.46
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.5%-31.2%
Market cap$2.3B$0.3B
P/E (trailing)18.7
Dividend yield0.65%2.39%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: NC 2.39% vs 0.65%Smaller drawdown: NC -31.2% vs -42.5%Higher 5y return: NC +96.1% vs -6.2%
-13%0%+52%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MTX · NC

Year-by-year returns

YearMTXNC
2022-16.7%+6.7%
2023+18.0%-1.5%
2024+7.4%-15.9%
2025-19.4%+68.8%
2026+19.2%-11.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MTX and NC good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.40, MTX and NC keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MTX and NC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.40 over 3 years, with 0.43 over the last year and 0.28 over 5 years.

Is NC a good diversifier for MTX?

Reasonably. At 0.40, MTX and NC keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.40 mean?

A reading of 0.40 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mtx-vs-nc.json

MTX vs NC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.40MTX vs NC0.40

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MTX vs NC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mtx-vs-nc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mtx-vs-nc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MTX correlations · NC correlations