PairBook
HomeMTUM › MTUM vs NRG

MTUM vs NRG: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and NRG Energy (NRG) carry a correlation of 0.52, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.52
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.49
long-run
Ann. covariance
479.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MTUM and NRG?

Over the past 3 years, MTUM and NRG moved with a correlation of 0.52, which is moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.31 versus 0.52 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.49, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 479.3 %².

Among the 109 assets we track against MTUM, NRG ranks #78 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MTUM outperformed by 47.0 percentage points (+25.2% for MTUM against -21.8% for NRG). Do not treat this figure as fixed: across three years the rolling one-year correlation ranged all the way from 0.20 to 0.76. Risk is not evenly split, since NRG carries 2.2 times the volatility of the other side.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MTUM vs NRG: side by side

MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF)NRG (NRG Energy)
1-year return+25.2%-21.8%
5-year return+76.1%+191.5%
Volatility (ann.)20.6%44.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.251.30
Max drawdown (3Y)-21.0%-38.9%
Market cap$24.1B
P/E (trailing)30.2
Dividend yield0.62%1.61%
Expense ratio0.15%
Assets under management$25.3B
Sector / categoryETF · US StyleUtilities
Higher yield: NRG 1.61% vs 0.62%Smaller drawdown: MTUM -21.0% vs -38.9%Higher 5y return: NRG +191.5% vs +76.1%

MTUM, iShares's Large Blend fund, carries $25.3B under management, 126 holdings, a 0.15% expense ratio, a 0.62% trailing dividend yield.

-22%0%+40%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MTUM · NRG

Year-by-year returns

YearMTUMNRG
2022-18.3%-23.5%
2023+9.1%+69.4%
2024+32.9%+78.6%
2025+22.1%+78.9%
2026+21.8%-27.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MTUM and NRG good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.52 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MTUM and NRG?

The MTUM/NRG correlation stands at 0.52 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.31, 5 years: 0.49), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is NRG a good diversifier for MTUM?

To a limited degree. At 0.52 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.52 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.52 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mtum-vs-nrg.json

MTUM vs NRG: 3-year weekly correlation 0.52MTUM vs NRG0.52

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MTUM vs NRG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mtum-vs-nrg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mtum-vs-nrg/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MTUM correlations · NRG correlations