PairBook
HomeMTNB › MTNB vs NOA

MTNB vs NOA: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Matinas Biopharma Holdings, Inc. (MTNB) and North American Construction Group Ltd. (NOA) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.00
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1114.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MTNB and NOA?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MTNB and NOA correlate at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.00) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.25). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.09, with an annualized covariance of -1114.6 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against MTNB, NOA lands near the bottom at #9. The last year tells two different stories: NOA led by 91.9 percentage points, -89.9% for MTNB against +2.0% for NOA. One caveat on sizing: MTNB is 3.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MTNB vs NOA: side by side

MTNB (Matinas Biopharma Holdings, Inc.)NOA (North American Construction Group Ltd.)
1-year return-89.9%+2.0%
5-year return-99.5%+2.6%
Volatility (ann.)120.2%37.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.730.84
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.4%-51.3%
Market cap$0.4B
P/E (trailing)16.5
Dividend yield0.00%3.61%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: NOA 3.61% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: NOA -51.3% vs -99.4%Higher 5y return: NOA +2.6% vs -99.5%
-88%0%+25%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MTNB · NOA

Year-by-year returns

YearMTNBNOA
2022-50.5%-9.8%
2023-56.8%+58.3%
2024-95.3%+5.2%
2025+14.9%-32.8%
2026-65.9%-4.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MTNB and NOA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MTNB and NOA?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MTNB and NOA is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.00 over 1 year and -0.09 over 5 years.

Is NOA a good diversifier for MTNB?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mtnb-vs-noa.json

MTNB vs NOA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25MTNB vs NOA-0.25

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MTNB vs NOA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mtnb-vs-noa.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mtnb-vs-noa/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MTNB correlations · NOA correlations