PairBook
HomeMTG › MTG vs WKHS

MTG vs WKHS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) and Workhorse Group, Inc. (WKHS) carry a correlation of -0.20, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.20
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-677.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MTG and WKHS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MTG and WKHS correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.20 over 1 year against -0.20 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.08, with an annualized covariance of -677.9 %².

Within MTG's tracked universe of 16 assets, WKHS comes in at #11 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MTG outperformed by 94.1 percentage points (+13.5% for MTG against -80.6% for WKHS). One caveat on sizing: WKHS is 7.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MTG vs WKHS: side by side

MTG (MGIC Investment Corporation)WKHS (Workhorse Group, Inc.)
1-year return+13.5%-80.6%
5-year return+129.5%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)21.6%157.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.571.44
Max drawdown (3Y)-15.8%-99.9%
Market cap$6.4B
P/E (trailing)9.8
Dividend yield1.92%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: MTG 1.92% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MTG -15.8% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: MTG +129.5% vs -100.0%
-84%0%+12%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MTG · WKHS

Year-by-year returns

YearMTGWKHS
2022-7.5%-65.1%
2023+52.4%-76.3%
2024+25.7%-90.3%
2025+25.9%-95.1%
2026+8.2%-37.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MTG and WKHS good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MTG and WKHS?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MTG and WKHS is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.20 over 1 year and -0.08 over 5 years.

Is WKHS a good diversifier for MTG?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mtg-vs-wkhs.json

MTG vs WKHS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20MTG vs WKHS-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MTG vs WKHS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mtg-vs-wkhs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mtg-vs-wkhs/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MTG correlations · WKHS correlations