PairBook
HomeMTD › MTD vs SOC

MTD vs SOC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Mettler Toledo (MTD) and Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carry a correlation of -0.16, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-518.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MTD and SOC?

On 3 years of weekly data the MTD/SOC correlation comes out at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.36) than the 3-year average (-0.16). The 5-year figure is -0.12, and annualized covariance runs at -518.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, SOC places #30 of the 38 assets tracked against MTD. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MTD ahead by 93.1 points (+9.5% versus -83.6%). Risk is not evenly split, since SOC carries 3.2 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MTD vs SOC: side by side

MTD (Mettler Toledo)SOC (Sable Offshore Corp.)
1-year return+9.5%-83.6%
5-year return-11.4%-51.7%
Volatility (ann.)31.4%101.7%
Beta vs S&P 5001.000.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.6%-90.7%
Market cap$28.2B$0.9B
P/E (trailing)31.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MTD -36.6% vs -90.7%Higher 5y return: MTD -11.4% vs -51.7%
-83%0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MTD · SOC

Year-by-year returns

YearMTDSOC
2022-14.8%+3.4%
2023-16.1%+13.3%
2024+0.9%+101.1%
2025+13.9%-60.6%
2026+0.9%-48.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MTD and SOC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MTD and SOC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.16 over 3 years, with -0.36 over the last year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is SOC a good diversifier for MTD?

Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.16 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mtd-vs-soc.json

MTD vs SOC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16MTD vs SOC-0.16

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MTD vs SOC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mtd-vs-soc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mtd-vs-soc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MTD correlations · SOC correlations