MSN vs PDCC: Correlation
Emerson Radio Corporation (MSN) and Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc. (PDCC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.27.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MSN and PDCC?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MSN and PDCC correlate at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.33 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -375.6 %².
Out of 10 assets tracked against MSN, PDCC lands near the bottom at #10. The last year tells two different stories: MSN led by 53.6 percentage points, +15.6% for MSN against -38.0% for PDCC. Risk is not evenly split, since MSN carries 1.7 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MSN vs PDCC: side by side
| MSN (Emerson Radio Corporation) | PDCC (Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +15.6% | -38.0% |
| 5-year return | -59.8% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 45.3% | 26.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.15 | 0.17 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -55.3% | -47.3% |
| Market cap | – | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MSN | PDCC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -34.6% | – |
| 2023 | +3.8% | – |
| 2024 | -23.6% | – |
| 2025 | -9.5% | -20.9% |
| 2026 | +24.7% | -27.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MSN and PDCC good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, MSN and PDCC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MSN and PDCC?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MSN and PDCC is -0.27 over 3 years, -0.33 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.
Is PDCC a good diversifier for MSN?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, MSN and PDCC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.27 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/msn-vs-pdcc.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/msn-vs-pdcc/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MSN correlations · PDCC correlations
