PairBook
HomeMSD › MSD vs VXZ

MSD vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.45, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.45
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.58
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.43
long-run
Ann. covariance
-134.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MSD and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MSD and VXZ correlate at -0.45, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.58) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.45). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.43, with an annualized covariance of -134.4 %².

Out of 13 assets tracked against MSD, VXZ lands near the bottom at #12. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MSD outperformed by 21.9 percentage points (+5.8% for MSD against -16.1% for VXZ). Risk is not evenly split, since VXZ carries 2.2 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MSD vs VXZ: side by side

MSD (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+5.8%-16.1%
5-year return+22.9%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)11.6%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.40-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-12.8%-36.4%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)6.9
Dividend yield9.78%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MSD -12.8% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: MSD +22.9% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MSD · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearMSDVXZ
2022-22.1%+0.5%
2023+19.2%-44.0%
2024+24.9%-12.7%
2025+5.6%+5.7%
2026+2.6%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MSD and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.45 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MSD and VXZ?

The MSD/VXZ correlation stands at -0.45 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.58, 5 years: -0.43), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for MSD?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.45 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.45 mean?

A reading of -0.45 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/msd-vs-vxz.json

MSD vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.45MSD vs VXZ-0.45

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MSD vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/msd-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/msd-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MSD correlations · VXZ correlations