PairBook
HomeMPWR › MPWR vs PULM

MPWR vs PULM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) and Pulmatrix, Inc. (PULM) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.14
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.11
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1577.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MPWR and PULM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MPWR and PULM correlate at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.14) than the 3-year average (-0.23). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.11, with an annualized covariance of -1577.8 %².

PULM is close to the least connected end of MPWR's tracked universe, ranking #37 of 41. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MPWR outperformed by 121.1 percentage points (+52.4% for MPWR against -68.7% for PULM). One caveat on sizing: PULM is 3.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MPWR vs PULM: side by side

MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems)PULM (Pulmatrix, Inc.)
1-year return+52.4%-68.7%
5-year return+170.3%-90.6%
Volatility (ann.)48.1%144.8%
Beta vs S&P 5002.22-0.18
Max drawdown (3Y)-51.6%-88.1%
Market cap$64.4B
P/E (trailing)79.4
Dividend yield0.55%0.00%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyUS Listed
Higher yield: MPWR 0.55% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MPWR -51.6% vs -88.1%Higher 5y return: MPWR +170.3% vs -90.6%
-75%0%+90%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MPWR · PULM

Year-by-year returns

YearMPWRPULM
2022-27.8%-55.7%
2023+79.8%-52.1%
2024-5.6%+275.3%
2025+54.5%-68.1%
2026+45.2%-31.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MPWR and PULM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MPWR and PULM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MPWR and PULM is -0.23 over 3 years, 0.14 over 1 year and -0.11 over 5 years.

Is PULM a good diversifier for MPWR?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mpwr-vs-pulm.json

MPWR vs PULM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23MPWR vs PULM-0.23

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MPWR vs PULM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mpwr-vs-pulm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mpwr-vs-pulm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MPWR correlations · PULM correlations