PairBook
HomeMNST › MNST vs ONFO

MNST vs ONFO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Monster Beverage (MNST) and Onfolio Holdings Inc. (ONFO) carry a correlation of -0.59, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.59
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.62
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.58
long-run
Ann. covariance
-166604.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MNST and ONFO?

Over the past 3 years, MNST and ONFO moved with a correlation of -0.59, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.62 over 1 year against -0.59 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.58, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -166604.9 %².

Among the 66 assets we track against MNST, ONFO ranks #58 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ONFO outperformed by 60.8 percentage points (-24.3% for MNST against +36.5% for ONFO). Risk is not evenly split, since ONFO carries 60.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MNST vs ONFO: side by side

MNST (Monster Beverage)ONFO (Onfolio Holdings Inc.)
1-year return-24.3%+36.5%
5-year return-4.5%n/a
Volatility (ann.)68.6%4150.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.806.65
Max drawdown (3Y)-54.5%-99.3%
Market cap$91.5B
P/E (trailing)43.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MNST -54.5% vs -99.3%
-96%0%+287%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MNST · ONFO

Year-by-year returns

YearMNSTONFO
2022+5.7%
2023+13.5%-66.4%
2024-8.8%+162.7%
2025+45.9%-49.3%
2026-39.1%+109.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MNST and ONFO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.59, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MNST and ONFO?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.59 over 3 years, with -0.62 over the last year and -0.58 over 5 years.

Is ONFO a good diversifier for MNST?

Yes: at -0.59, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.59 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mnst-vs-onfo.json

MNST vs ONFO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.59MNST vs ONFO-0.59

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MNST vs ONFO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mnst-vs-onfo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mnst-vs-onfo/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MNST correlations · ONFO correlations