PairBook
HomeMMU › MMU vs VXZ

MMU vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund, Inc. (MMU) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.39, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.39
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
-113.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MMU and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MMU and VXZ correlate at -0.39, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.46 over 1 year against -0.39 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.35, with an annualized covariance of -113.6 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of MMU's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 11. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MMU outperformed by 25.3 percentage points (+9.2% for MMU against -16.1% for VXZ). Risk is not evenly split, since VXZ carries 2.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MMU vs VXZ: side by side

MMU (Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+9.2%-16.1%
5-year return-2.0%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)11.3%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.27-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-9.5%-36.4%
Market cap$0.6B
P/E (trailing)10.7
Dividend yield6.45%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MMU -9.5% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: MMU -2.0% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+10%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MMU · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearMMUVXZ
2022-19.6%+0.5%
2023+5.7%-44.0%
2024+6.6%-12.7%
2025+9.3%+5.7%
2026+1.3%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MMU and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.39, MMU and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MMU and VXZ?

The MMU/VXZ correlation stands at -0.39 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.46, 5 years: -0.35), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for MMU?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.39, MMU and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.39 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.39 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mmu-vs-vxz.json

MMU vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.39MMU vs VXZ-0.39

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MMU vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mmu-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mmu-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MMU correlations · VXZ correlations