PairBook
HomeMLPB › MLPB vs VXZ

MLPB vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B due (MLPB) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.36, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.36
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
-154.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MLPB and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, MLPB and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.36, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.19 versus -0.36 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.35, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -154.4 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of MLPB's tracked universe, ranking #22 of 22. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MLPB outperformed by 45.5 percentage points (+29.4% for MLPB against -16.1% for VXZ). Risk is not evenly split, since VXZ carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MLPB vs VXZ: side by side

MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B due)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+29.4%-16.1%
5-year return+186.2%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)16.5%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.32-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-16.5%-36.4%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MLPB -16.5% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: MLPB +186.2% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+31%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MLPB · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearMLPBVXZ
2022+30.2%+0.5%
2023+22.0%-44.0%
2024+25.5%-12.7%
2025+7.4%+5.7%
2026+29.7%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MLPB and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.36, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MLPB and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.36 over 3 years, with 0.19 over the last year and -0.35 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for MLPB?

Yes: at -0.36, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.36 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.36 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mlpb-vs-vxz.json

MLPB vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.36MLPB vs VXZ-0.36

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MLPB vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mlpb-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mlpb-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MLPB correlations · VXZ correlations