PairBook
HomeMLI › MLI vs VXZ

MLI vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.35, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.35
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.10
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.36
long-run
Ann. covariance
-280.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MLI and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MLI and VXZ correlate at -0.35, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.10) than the 3-year average (-0.35). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.36, with an annualized covariance of -280.5 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against MLI, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #9. The last year tells two different stories: MLI led by 50.5 percentage points, +34.4% for MLI against -16.1% for VXZ.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MLI vs VXZ: side by side

MLI (Mueller Industries, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+34.4%-16.1%
5-year return+509.6%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)31.5%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.93-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.8%-36.4%
Market cap$14.2B
P/E (trailing)16.7
Dividend yield0.94%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MLI -27.8% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: MLI +509.6% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+45%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MLI · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearMLIVXZ
2022+1.0%+0.5%
2023+62.4%-44.0%
2024+70.5%-12.7%
2025+46.3%+5.7%
2026+12.5%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MLI and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.35 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MLI and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.35 over 3 years, with -0.10 over the last year and -0.36 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for MLI?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.35 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mli-vs-vxz.json

MLI vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.35MLI vs VXZ-0.35

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MLI vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mli-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mli-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MLI correlations · VXZ correlations