MLGO vs VST: Correlation
MicroAlgo, Inc. (MLGO) and Vistra Corp. (VST) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.18.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MLGO and VST?
Over the past 3 years, MLGO and VST moved with a correlation of -0.18, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.34) than the 3-year average (-0.18). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.16, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -4676.4 %².
Within MLGO's tracked universe of 33 assets, VST comes in at #17 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VST ahead by 25.1 points (-52.9% versus -27.8%). Risk is not evenly split, since MLGO carries 9.3 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MLGO vs VST: side by side
| MLGO (MicroAlgo, Inc.) | VST (Vistra Corp.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -52.9% | -27.8% |
| 5-year return | -100.0% | +713.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 489.7% | 52.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -2.77 | 1.62 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -100.0% | -48.8% |
| Market cap | – | $46.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | 1.9 | 23.6 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.65% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Utilities |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MLGO | VST |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -87.6% | +5.1% |
| 2023 | -27.0% | +70.7% |
| 2024 | -97.9% | +261.5% |
| 2025 | -96.1% | +17.7% |
| 2026 | -6.3% | -13.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MLGO and VST good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MLGO and VST?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.18 over 3 years, with 0.34 over the last year and -0.16 over 5 years.
Is VST a good diversifier for MLGO?
Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mlgo-vs-vst.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mlgo-vs-vst/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MLGO correlations · VST correlations
