PairBook
HomeMLGO › MLGO vs PH

MLGO vs PH: Correlation

How closely do MicroAlgo, Inc. (MLGO) and Parker Hannifin (PH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.17, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.16
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2243.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MLGO and PH?

Over the past 3 years, MLGO and PH moved with a correlation of -0.17, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.16 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.12, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2243.7 %².

Within MLGO's tracked universe of 33 assets, PH comes in at #15 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: PH led by 85.7 percentage points, -52.9% for MLGO against +32.8% for PH. Risk is not evenly split, since MLGO carries 18.4 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MLGO vs PH: side by side

MLGO (MicroAlgo, Inc.)PH (Parker Hannifin)
1-year return-52.9%+32.8%
5-year return-100.0%+256.4%
Volatility (ann.)489.7%26.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-2.771.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-26.8%
Market cap$127.5B
P/E (trailing)1.936.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.71%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Lower P/E: MLGO 1.9 vs 36.5Higher yield: PH 0.71% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PH -26.8% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: PH +256.4% vs -100.0%
-61%0%+42%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MLGO · PH

Year-by-year returns

YearMLGOPH
2022-87.6%-6.9%
2023-27.0%+60.8%
2024-97.9%+39.6%
2025-96.1%+39.5%
2026-6.3%+15.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MLGO and PH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MLGO and PH?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MLGO and PH is -0.17 over 3 years, -0.16 over 1 year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is PH a good diversifier for MLGO?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

A reading of -0.17 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mlgo-vs-ph.json

MLGO vs PH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17MLGO vs PH-0.17

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MLGO vs PH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mlgo-vs-ph.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mlgo-vs-ph/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MLGO correlations · PH correlations