PairBook
HomeMLAB › MLAB vs VXZ

MLAB vs VXZ: Correlation

Mesa Laboratories, Inc. (MLAB) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.33.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.33
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.41
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.32
long-run
Ann. covariance
-435.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MLAB and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the MLAB/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.33, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.41 over 1 year against -0.33 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.32, and annualized covariance runs at -435.3 %².

Among the 12 assets we track against MLAB, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #12. The last year tells two different stories: MLAB led by 104.5 percentage points, +88.4% for MLAB against -16.1% for VXZ. One caveat on sizing: MLAB is 2.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MLAB vs VXZ: side by side

MLAB (Mesa Laboratories, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+88.4%-16.1%
5-year return-51.1%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)52.3%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.12-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-62.8%-36.4%
Market cap$0.7B
P/E (trailing)151.4
Dividend yield0.50%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -62.8%Higher 5y return: MLAB -51.1% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+100%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MLAB · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearMLABVXZ
2022-49.2%+0.5%
2023-36.6%-44.0%
2024+26.6%-12.7%
2025-40.0%+5.7%
2026+64.4%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MLAB and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, MLAB and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MLAB and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MLAB and VXZ is -0.33 over 3 years, -0.41 over 1 year and -0.32 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for MLAB?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, MLAB and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mlab-vs-vxz.json

MLAB vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.33MLAB vs VXZ-0.33

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MLAB vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mlab-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mlab-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MLAB correlations · VXZ correlations